<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Impact of Search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2007/11/18/social-impact-of-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2007/11/18/social-impact-of-search/</link>
	<description>paglia&#039;s thoughts: &#34;one to negative one&#34; and some noise in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:04:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lou Paglia</title>
		<link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2007/11/18/social-impact-of-search/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Paglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2007/11/18/social-impact-of-search/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Jim, very interesting find regarding the Wired article.  Completely agree that it does make you reflect on how much you base your &quot;knowledge&quot; or generalize on certain topic simply based on a little bit of information.  And search results are just that, a look into a particular topic and not a complete look, and depending on the person searching, it may not even be a good look.  If you do not know about a topic, logic would dictate that you don&#039;t know what you are looking for necessarily, that in itself does not bode well for getting a holistic picture returned to you about that topic via a search engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-03378314afff8dc1d0eddbcfe8d759667605cc7e'>Jim, very interesting find regarding the Wired article.  Completely agree that it does make you reflect on how much you base your &#8220;knowledge&#8221; or generalize on certain topic simply based on a little bit of information.  And search results are just that, a look into a particular topic and not a complete look, and depending on the person searching, it may not even be a good look.  If you do not know about a topic, logic would dictate that you don&#8217;t know what you are looking for necessarily, that in itself does not bode well for getting a holistic picture returned to you about that topic via a search engine.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Muntone</title>
		<link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2007/11/18/social-impact-of-search/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Muntone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2007/11/18/social-impact-of-search/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>You know, Uncle Rupert said something similar in Wired in 2006, though his comment was that (I&#039;m paraphrasing) &quot;all this social stuff would have the same impact as the printing press.&quot;

It&#039;s nice to see the printing press finally getting the kudos it deserves. But anyhow...

It&#039;s a shame, but, as someone who thought high school (albeit briefly) regurgitating the first three links on a google search is pretty much exactly what passes for good &quot;research&quot; these days unless you force your kids to dig deeper into a given topic. 

So, yes, I think I am saying that the social impact of search is probably tied in closely with that saying about &quot;a little knowledge being dangerous.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-ff8ec0623c38000fd2af8f80ccafb6dfd6ad8f9e'>You know, Uncle Rupert said something similar in Wired in 2006, though his comment was that (I&#8217;m paraphrasing) &#8220;all this social stuff would have the same impact as the printing press.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice to see the printing press finally getting the kudos it deserves. But anyhow&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame, but, as someone who thought high school (albeit briefly) regurgitating the first three links on a google search is pretty much exactly what passes for good &#8220;research&#8221; these days unless you force your kids to dig deeper into a given topic. </p>
<p>So, yes, I think I am saying that the social impact of search is probably tied in closely with that saying about &#8220;a little knowledge being dangerous.&#8221;</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
