Comments on: You’re Out There, Now What? http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/ paglia's thoughts: "one to negative one" and some noise in between Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:53:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: loupaglia http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-683 loupaglia Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:50:13 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-683 Absolutely. I can tell you as a hiring manager, I already do exactly what I was discussing in the post. But I didn't look at is as an actual approach until yesterday when each of those issues came up. Anything available on the web is fair game. But I still feel that there is so much more potential for it to help you than to hurt you, obviously depending on the person.<br><br>The other interesting element that I did not discuss in the post is the law of probability, perhaps I will in the future. Basically, the more UGC one produces the chances increase that someone is not going to approve of something. This is why determining what is bad? what is unprofessional? is so critical. Absolutely. I can tell you as a hiring manager, I already do exactly what I was discussing in the post. But I didn't look at is as an actual approach until yesterday when each of those issues came up. Anything available on the web is fair game. But I still feel that there is so much more potential for it to help you than to hurt you, obviously depending on the person.

The other interesting element that I did not discuss in the post is the law of probability, perhaps I will in the future. Basically, the more UGC one produces the chances increase that someone is not going to approve of something. This is why determining what is bad? what is unprofessional? is so critical.

]]> By: loupaglia http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-684 loupaglia Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:41:08 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-684 Thanks. Speaking of Presidents, I almost touched on President elections in the post and the level of investigation/probing the candidates are placed under in an election year. As more information is available on a person based on what they blog, twitter, seesmic, vlog and podcast to name a few, how much do people plan on scrutinizing all available information on a person. For President, it is everything. I guess it will depend on the level of the position.<br><br>But there are folks much more ramped in social media than I and they have/are producing a lot of content to go through, even more now with Qik, etc. It is a daunting proposition. Perhaps we are going to dawn into a whole new industry? Thanks. Speaking of Presidents, I almost touched on President elections in the post and the level of investigation/probing the candidates are placed under in an election year. As more information is available on a person based on what they blog, twitter, seesmic, vlog and podcast to name a few, how much do people plan on scrutinizing all available information on a person. For President, it is everything. I guess it will depend on the level of the position.

But there are folks much more ramped in social media than I and they have/are producing a lot of content to go through, even more now with Qik, etc. It is a daunting proposition. Perhaps we are going to dawn into a whole new industry?

]]> By: loupaglia http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-607 loupaglia Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:50:13 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-607 Absolutely. I can tell you as a hiring manager, I already do exactly what I was discussing in the post. But I didn't look at is as an actual approach until yesterday when each of those issues came up. Anything available on the web is fair game. But I still feel that there is so much more potential for it to help you than to hurt you, obviously depending on the person.<br><br>The other interesting element that I did not discuss in the post is the law of probability, perhaps I will in the future. Basically, the more UGC one produces the chances increase that someone is not going to approve of something. This is why determining what is bad? what is unprofessional? is so critical. Absolutely. I can tell you as a hiring manager, I already do exactly what I was discussing in the post. But I didn't look at is as an actual approach until yesterday when each of those issues came up. Anything available on the web is fair game. But I still feel that there is so much more potential for it to help you than to hurt you, obviously depending on the person.

The other interesting element that I did not discuss in the post is the law of probability, perhaps I will in the future. Basically, the more UGC one produces the chances increase that someone is not going to approve of something. This is why determining what is bad? what is unprofessional? is so critical.

]]> By: loupaglia http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-606 loupaglia Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:41:08 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-606 Thanks. Speaking of Presidents, I almost touched on President elections in the post and the level of investigation/probing the candidates are placed under in an election year. As more information is available on a person based on what they blog, twitter, seesmic, vlog and podcast to name a few, how much do people plan on scrutinizing all available information on a person. For President, it is everything. I guess it will depend on the level of the position.<br><br>But there are folks much more ramped in social media than I and they have/are producing a lot of content to go through, even more now with Qik, etc. It is a daunting proposition. Perhaps we are going to dawn into a whole new industry? Thanks. Speaking of Presidents, I almost touched on President elections in the post and the level of investigation/probing the candidates are placed under in an election year. As more information is available on a person based on what they blog, twitter, seesmic, vlog and podcast to name a few, how much do people plan on scrutinizing all available information on a person. For President, it is everything. I guess it will depend on the level of the position.

But there are folks much more ramped in social media than I and they have/are producing a lot of content to go through, even more now with Qik, etc. It is a daunting proposition. Perhaps we are going to dawn into a whole new industry?

]]> By: loupaglia http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-431 loupaglia Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:50:13 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-431 Absolutely. I can tell you as a hiring manager, I already do exactly what I was discussing in the post. But I didn't look at is as an actual approach until yesterday when each of those issues came up. Anything available on the web is fair game. But I still feel that there is so much more potential for it to help you than to hurt you, obviously depending on the person.<br><br>The other interesting element that I did not discuss in the post is the law of probability, perhaps I will in the future. Basically, the more UGC one produces the chances increase that someone is not going to approve of something. This is why determining what is bad? what is unprofessional? is so critical. Absolutely. I can tell you as a hiring manager, I already do exactly what I was discussing in the post. But I didn't look at is as an actual approach until yesterday when each of those issues came up. Anything available on the web is fair game. But I still feel that there is so much more potential for it to help you than to hurt you, obviously depending on the person.

The other interesting element that I did not discuss in the post is the law of probability, perhaps I will in the future. Basically, the more UGC one produces the chances increase that someone is not going to approve of something. This is why determining what is bad? what is unprofessional? is so critical.

]]> By: loupaglia http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-429 loupaglia Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:41:08 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-429 Thanks. Speaking of Presidents, I almost touched on President elections in the post and the level of investigation/probing the candidates are placed under in an election year. As more information is available on a person based on what they blog, twitter, seesmic, vlog and podcast to name a few, how much do people plan on scrutinizing all available information on a person. For President, it is everything. I guess it will depend on the level of the position.<br><br>But there are folks much more ramped in social media than I and they have/are producing a lot of content to go through, even more now with Qik, etc. It is a daunting proposition. Perhaps we are going to dawn into a whole new industry? Thanks. Speaking of Presidents, I almost touched on President elections in the post and the level of investigation/probing the candidates are placed under in an election year. As more information is available on a person based on what they blog, twitter, seesmic, vlog and podcast to name a few, how much do people plan on scrutinizing all available information on a person. For President, it is everything. I guess it will depend on the level of the position.

But there are folks much more ramped in social media than I and they have/are producing a lot of content to go through, even more now with Qik, etc. It is a daunting proposition. Perhaps we are going to dawn into a whole new industry?

]]> By: greenguy http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-430 greenguy Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:24:39 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-430 I am going through this with my siblings right now. Going for the first real job after college means your resume is a little light but your online footprint may not be. They finally understand that their facebook / myspace profile will be used as a resume addendum probably before they even get into the interview. I am going through this with my siblings right now. Going for the first real job after college means your resume is a little light but your online footprint may not be. They finally understand that their facebook / myspace profile will be used as a resume addendum probably before they even get into the interview.

]]> By: thingles http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/comment-page-1/#comment-428 thingles Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:24:02 +0000 http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2008/03/26/youre-out-there-now-what/#comment-428 Good post Lou. One of my favorite comments in this vein is the reflection that the President of the United States 30 years from now, currently has a MySpace page. Just think who she has as friends. It makes you think. Good post Lou. One of my favorite comments in this vein is the reflection that the President of the United States 30 years from now, currently has a MySpace page. Just think who she has as friends. It makes you think.

]]>