<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand and Reputation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/01/23/brand-and-reputation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/01/23/brand-and-reputation/</link>
	<description>paglia&#039;s thoughts: &#34;one to negative one&#34; and some noise in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Comm Biz &#187; Why do some companies get eaten alive by bloggers while others don&#8217;t?</title>
		<link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/01/23/brand-and-reputation/comment-page-1/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comm Biz &#187; Why do some companies get eaten alive by bloggers while others don&#8217;t?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/?p=245#comment-568</guid>
		<description>[...] Brand and Reputation (loupaglia.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brand and Reputation (loupaglia.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/2009/01/23/brand-and-reputation/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loupaglia.com/correlate/?p=245#comment-543</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think transparency, sincerity, and timeliness make up a good portion of it. A company that makes a statement weeks after the incident comes across as trying to hide something and disingenuous.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;This comment was originally posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newcommbiz.com/why-do-some-companies-get-eaten-alive-by-bloggers-while-others-dont/#comment-25938&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; title=&quot;&#8220;Why do some companies get eaten alive by bloggers while others don’t?&#8221; (http://www.newcommbiz.com/)&quot;&gt;New Comm Biz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think transparency, sincerity, and timeliness make up a good portion of it. A company that makes a statement weeks after the incident comes across as trying to hide something and disingenuous.</p>
<p><i>This comment was originally posted on <a href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/why-do-some-companies-get-eaten-alive-by-bloggers-while-others-dont/#comment-25938" rel="nofollow" title="&#8220;Why do some companies get eaten alive by bloggers while others don’t?&#8221; (<a href="http://www.newcommbiz.com/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.newcommbiz.com/)</a>&#8220;>New Comm Biz</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

