correlate Rotating Header Image

January, 2009:

Certainty Alludes Us

Cover of

Cover via Amazon

I am currently reading a book entitled The Black Swan by Nassim Nicholas Taleb or NNT as he calls himself throughout.  It is a very thought-provoking read and gets you thinking quite critically with regard to how you assess the probabilities of a given set of circumstances, how sound (or un-sound) are predictive models and obviously the impact of the unexpected (or Black Swan).  Makes sense, after all the sub-title is “The Impact of the Highly Improbable”.

I’m about 2/3 of the way through and find it a strenuous read simply by challenging myself to think through the principles that NNT takes you through.  The concept of certainty and our natural search for causal effects is something he discusses quite thoroughly.  We do often look for the “cause” of what has occurred or what we believe will occur based on a given set of circumstances or by taking a certain course of action.  It is ingrained in our being. He posits that this is often not the right way to look at things.  That the world is too complex to wrap everything nicely in a box with a bow.

We also don’t typically think of things in terms of NOT, usually we always aim for what NNT refers to as confirmation, what IS.  How often do you look at a problem and take the approach to prove your hypothesis is correct?  Well, isn’t the only way to truly do that is to disprove every other possibility?  How can you guarantee that you’ve covered every possibility?  Truth is, we can’t. Certainty for the most part alludes us.

That doesn’t mean we should try however.  I recently read the book Moneyball and cannot help but appreciate its juxtaposition with this book’s concepts.  It discusses quite the opposite view. Billy Beane’s strive to design the best way to predict future performance of baseball players and he was quite successful doing just that (and not in obvious ways). Ironically, Taleb too touches briefly on baseball quoting Yogi Berra, “It is tough to make predictions, especially about the future” and referring to him in a way that applies to many of us within our chosen fields:

practitioner of uncertainty, and as a baseball player and coach, regularly faced random outcomes, and had to face their results deep into his bones

One of my favorite lines from the book is:

It is often said that “is wise he who can see things coming.”  Perhaps the wise one is the one who knows that he cannot see things far away.

I cannot help but appreciate the impact of keeping an open mind can help decision-making and on how “certainty” can affect judgment.  Keeping a healthy dose of perspective with regard to the improbability that exists can only help us make sound decisions.  Being consciously aware that even with the best and brightest predictive modeling, there is a degree of chaos or uncertainty in almost everything that we cannot control.  Working through, recognizing it and obviously not falling into ‘paralysis by analysis’ is paramount and applies to everything, in work and in life.

I’ll be honest, reading this book, I can’t but keep thinking of Jeff Goldblum’s character in Jurassic Park, Dr. Ian Malcolm, spouting off about ‘chaos theory’.  If a mix of statistical probability and philosophy is something that interests you, I recommend the book.  Of course, how can I not recommend a book that incorporates a chapter entitled, “How to Look for Bird Poop”.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Renewable Energy Power Grid

On 140 acres of unused land on Nellis Air Forc...

Image via Wikipedia

There’s a very good article, Lifeline for Renewable Power, in the latest edition of MIT Technology Review regarding the need for a revamped energy grid that can distribute power generated through alternative energy methods into the places the need it. There is always the ongoing debate on whether we even have at our disposal a set of alternative energy resources that are comprehensive enough to significantly reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.  I don’t want to get into that debate in this post but it is clear we can certainly do a lot more with nuclear, hydro, wind and solar power sources.

And it seems the consensus is that regardless of what alternative energy sources we utilize, the current energy grid that we rely on is in major need of an overhaul.  The current system has major inefficiencies for today’s needs (anyone who experienced the northeast blackout a few years ago can attest to that).

Smart-grid technologies could reduce overall electricity consumption by 6 percent and peak demand by as much as 27 percent. The peak-demand reductions alone would save between $175 billion and $332 billion over 20 years, according to the Brattle Group, a consultancy in Cambridge, MA.

So to sum it up, I think there is more consensus on the fact we are going to need a new grid or at least major renovation on the current one.

Gore called for a “unified national smart grid” that would move power generated from renewable sources to cities, increase the efficiency of electricity use, and allow for greater control over renewable resources. He estimated that the grid overhaul would cost $400 billion over 10 years.

So $400B?  Please allow me to backseat govern for a moment.  $400B to redo the energy grid and move us towards a better energy system?  And we think $700B bail out package to financial institutions suffering from many wounds that are self-inflicted is a better investment where money could go?   Okay, the financial markets situation is a very fragile one and the downstream negative consequences was not something that could be risked.  This has been debated as well.  Perhaps, then we should give the energy grid a nice $14B kick start instead of funding the auto bailout that went in front of the senate, seems to keep growing and one has to question on whether the world needs poorly run car companies.

Let’s move forward, not backward.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Perspective and Reflection

Evening reflection by matey_88

With all the news swirling around lately, it feels to me that we’ve lost a little bit of perspective.  It could be international relations, the stock market or the economy just to name a few, all very important things that affect our lives and life on a global scale. The economy is not the greatest right now.  We’ve witnessed over the past few months some of the worst corruption and corporate negligence on very large scales.  But does that mean everything should be put under the microscope, that everything is wrong rather than the other way around?

Let’s take two of the bigger stories in the tech industry of late: Yahoo! and Steve Jobs.  (I could argue these are not the two biggest things going on but they certainly are driving a large portion of the media coverage)

Yahoo! has been under the microscope for some time now.  And yes, an offer from Microsoft at $33 per share is looking pretty compelling when you look at where the stock is today.  But let’s not lose sight of what is good.  Yahoo! has $7B in revenue, is a known brand and has a number of category leading products. Last time I checked, that is pretty good.

The story with regard to Jobs’ health I find more concerning.  I’m a shareholder in Apple but I don’t think it is my right to probe into the health of an executive.  There is no correlation between Jobs’ health and bad company performance.  So the ‘conspiracy theory’ swirling around this (even if Apple could have been more forthright) just doesn’t deserve this much negative attention.  Because we’ve been burned by poor corporate governance in several situations should not mean that is the litmus test on how we handle all questionable story lines.  In fact, Kara Swisher has what I believe to be a great post with regard to Steve Jobs today over at Boomtown, particularly the transcript of Job’s speech at Stanford.  It is about perspective and a bit of reflection, even in cloudy times, and driving forward from there (that’s what I took from it).

I don’t plan to jump into philosophy here so I won’t.  My sense is everything has reached this point of “permanence”, that all is bad right now and is being looked at with that lens.  With that there’s been some loss of perspective, some loss of reflection on what is really important. Tim O’Reilly recently posted his thoughts on what matters.  I agree with much of what he said.

I’m confident that things are going to look up.  It is going to take some time.  I know one thing though, that it starts with a positive look on things, a look at the things that are important and a passionate drive forward from there.  Just a quick glance back at the innovation that came out of the first bubble burst tells us that is true.  And that is what is at the heart of the entrepreneurial spirit after all.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Now That’s A Burger

The Worst Foods of 2009 are out from Men’s Health.  Frighteningly, one of the winners something that I think sounds pretty darn good: Chili’s Smokehouse Bacon Triple-The-Cheese Big Mouth Burger with Jalapeno Ranch Dressing.  That is until you read the run down on the caloric intake.

2,040 calories
150 g fat (53 g saturated)
110 g protein
4,900 mg sodium

Can you imagine?  One sitting, one meal and what you eat is 2.5 days of your fat intake and almost three days of saturated fat allowance.  (It sure does sound good though)  It does make you wonder how many miles on the treadmill you need to run to burn off one burger.  If you are really interested, you can read the musings of someone out there who took the burger head-on and reported on their experience.

And if you read this far, you may as well consider getting the burger Chili’s To-Go and then head over to Baskin Robbins for the Baskin Robbins Large Chocolate Oreo Shake to wash it down.

Check out the tale-of-the-tape on the shake and read the full article over at Yahoo!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Give Bartz a Chance

Yahoo! Inc.
Image via Wikipedia

The hot news of the day is Carol Bartz being the choice for CEO over at Yahoo! There is plenty of coverage out there about the news.  It seems from everything that I’ve read and how the markets have reacted that the choice is not a popular one.  My two cents on the subject is that we should take a step back and give Bartz a chance to assess the Yahoo! landscape, make some decisions and begin to re-align Yahoo! on the determined course and strategy.  I made some early comments on this over at TechCrunch.

Yahoo! has a tremendous number of assets and really smart people.  Products ranging from search to delicious to flickr all can be knitted together in a cohesive strategy if the right leader and decision making framework is in place.  The boat needs to get pointed in a unified direction. That is why I think Bartz could be a good choice.  She may be new to the web and to media but Yahoo! has a campus full of individuals who are passionate and go to work everyday to build great stuff.  Bartz, from what I’ve read thus far, seems like someone that can assess the playing field for the organization, distill the information and make key decisions.  She clearly understands the gauntlet laid out as she stated:

Yahoo…a company with great assets that frankly could use a little management.

It all seems to blur together at this point but it seems the news regarding the company has been on a downward news cycle since the infamous Peanut Butter memo.  Perhaps there was a lot of merit in that memo where the general gist is that Yahoo! had its hands in too many things and needed to focus.  That is before any of the Microsoft debacle even occurred.  Then everyone coming out of the woodwork to put their view on the situation and what they should do to which Bartz responds:

Everybody on outside deciding what Yahoo should or shouldn’t do–that’s going to stop.

As I said, she is going to need some time to get on the ground, assess and move from there.  She is going to need that chance to do it.  I, for one, believe she should have that chance.  Clearly, she does do:

I can’t give you a timeline. I’m very good at listening, digging around, finding out what’s going on. I don’t expect it’ll take an extraordinary amount of time, but this is a big company. Let’s not put ourselves in some crazy timeline. Let’s give this company some frigging breathing room.

I, again, am bullish on Yahoo!  I think they have some great elements going for it and I never quite rallied behind the concept that they were in real trouble.  Time will tell but I think picking a CEO like Carol Bartz is a step in the right direction in changing the negative momentum that has surrounded Yahoo! for some time and then getting the company plowing forward again.  That’s it, from here out, I plan to give them some room to breath.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]